January 10, 2008

Benazir Bhutto

The Lady Who Knew Too Much?  

Unless you've been living under a rock the last few weeks, you probably have heard the horrible news from Pakistan about the assassination of the former twice Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.  It is not still clear as to who was behind this assassination, although the Bush Administration and the current president of Pakistan Pervez Musharraf were quick to point their fingers at the usual suspects Al Qaeda and Islamic extremists. As the Church Lady from Saturday Night Live would say, "hmmm, how conveeeeenient."  Of course it is not beyond the realm of possibility that either one of these groups could have been the perpetrator, especially given Bhutto's record in ‘opposing' Islamic extremism and her attempt to bring in some form of ‘modernity' to the country. But it is also not entirely inconceivable that Musharraf himself could have had a hand in it with some help from the US administration. After all, John Negroponte made a trip to Pakistan recently under the guise of a ‘diplomatic mission'. Of course, those who know Mr. Negroponte's background  can deduce what that mission could have been about.  Strangely enough, a visit from Mr. Negroponte in any country is followed by a sudden taste for blood by some groups, emergence of death squads everywhere, assassination of political leaders, instability in the country etc.... very strange. Well, I guess the guy just has bad luck following him everywhere he goes.

It may not be an over statement to say that the repercussion of Benazir Bhutto's assassination could very well be a catastrophic one the likes of which can be compared to the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria , which was the spark that lit the flames of World War I.  After all, Pakistan is one of the few countries that have nuclear weapons in one of the most volatile regions in the world and is also safe haven to some of the most militant Islamic extremists.

In the process of following Bhutto's story last month, I came across an interview she did with ‘Sir' David Frost, a well respected journalist on "Al Jazeera English". In this 14 minute interview, Frost was asking Bhutto about the first assassination attempt on her life back in October and the former twice PM of Pakistan, who probably had solid and trustworthy sources in the region, made a rather startling...no wait...an earth shattering revelation.  About 5 minutes into the interview, Bhutto, in describing who she thought were behind the first assassination attempt, mentions the name Omar Sheik as the man who "murdered Osama Bin Lade"...WHAT????  Murdered Osama Bin Laden????   What was more interesting was that Frost does not even pause to ask a question about what Bhutto said. Was David Frost, whose program is ironically called "frost over the world", putting the Osama story, which really is the bigger story here, on ice? Or better yet, is Osama's body being kept on ice somewhere already to be brought out at the appropriate time by the ‘good guys' who are fighting this so called ‘war on terror'?  The appropriate response from Frost at that point should have been, ‘Wait wait wait...one bloody second...back up a bit.  Did you just say the man who murdered Osama Bin Laden?' Any sensible journalist would have asked that question, because the Osama murder story trumps all the other peripheral stories, including Bhutto's assassination attempt and her bid to un-sit her opponent Musharraf, whose only reason for being in power is his ties with the US administration to fight the so called war on terror whose very symbol is none other than Osama Bin Laden. 
 

This also raises another question about the Western world and its media.  If David Frost, a well know and reputable journalist, lets this nugget of information go by without so much as a blink of an eye, how can we take what these journalists have to say about anything seriously? What could be more important than this?  Is Frost covering something up or does he think that this is a non-story?  And how about the US media?  Did anyone of the major US media outlets pick this up?  You would think this is would be a front-page news around the world.  It's been over 2 months since the interview was conducted, but not one news outlet has even said a word about it.
 

And finally, is there any doubt that the Bush administration, and maybe perhaps even the British counter parts, with the help of their lap dog media, have been playing people around the world with this Emanuel Goldstein like face of terror which is Osama Bin Laden? And could Mrs. Bhutto let something slip out that the US administration did not want to get out? Makes you wonder, doesn't it? 

Well, watch the video and see for yourself.


alt : http://www.youtube.com/v/oIO8B6fpFSQ&rel=1
Chereka

Posted by CHEREKA at 10:31:16 | Permanent Link | Comments (6) |
Comments
1 - Hi Chereka,

What a coincience we just watched that same program on the last Panorama, which is a BBC flagship program about Sir david frost not picking on the Benazir Bhutto reference to the death of Osama when replyng to who she thought tried to kill her the first time. it really is possible that Sir David didnt get it. He is a reputed journalist but not one known for probing technique in his interviews, they should have sent Jeremy Paxman of the BBC or John Humphries, the would have pounced on it. Sir David Frost is known as a soft interviewer who doesnt probe hard enough his interviwees, and doenst press them on important points.

He is never gonna live it down that he might missed a big story if he let it go deliberatly which I sincerely doubt, he will be mocked, if not sinister wonderings will begin...either way after this it is retirement home time for him..an it is on tape forever Sir David maybe missing the most important scoop of his career that never was...Sir David arise, it is gardening time for you now... (Comment this)

Written by: Peripheral1 at 2008/01/10 - 16:15:21
2 - this video is classic conspiracy theory fodder

i think it was just a slip of the tongue and she meant Omar Sheik murdered Daniel Pearl, the american journalist that Omar was charged of kidnapping and murdering. Frost didn't bother correcting or getting her to clarify because it was judged as being a slip of the tongue. indeed, if she was truly asserting that Omar killed Osman, then she would have made it absolutely clear and repeated the assertion elsewhere. (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2008/01/11 - 00:30:56
3 - this video is classic conspiracy theory fodder

i think it was just a slip of the tongue and she meant Omar Sheik murdered Daniel Pearl, the american journalist that Omar was charged of kidnapping and murdering. Frost didn't bother correcting or getting her to clarify because it was judged as being a slip of the tongue. indeed, if she was truly asserting that Omar killed Osman, then she would have made it absolutely clear and repeated the assertion elsewhere.


If it was a slip of the tongue why didnt she correct it? , such an important slip of the tongue would need to be clssified doesnt it? How do you know what she meant for certain yourself? Has Sir David told you? Only Sir David knows what happened or maybe not and he has not said anything. (Comment this)

Written by: Peripheral1 at 2008/01/11 - 06:33:57
4 - Oh guys common already. Are you serious about this conspiracy theory? That is laughable. It might end up being just nothing. Anyone of her stature and living in Pakistan is bound to be killed.

Obviously, the Americans are not involved whatsoever. They are much smarter than that as you well know. Common Benazir is a bigger figure today than she ever was before her death.

Unfortunately, all these people have big ideas and grand plans for their country that their country is not ready for yet.

I guess some have to die for the country to seek and accept change. That's the price of democracy throughout history.

http://abesha.wordpress.com (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2008/01/12 - 13:31:05
5 - You think it is a coincidence Condoleezsa Rice was the one that arranged Bhutto's return to Pakistan when even Bhutto herself said her life would be endangered??

Like Chereka brilliantly put it, Bhutto knew too much! See Anonymous, if Bin Laden is dead , Bush & co. can no longer use their favorite "war on terror" pretense to advance their agendas, the wars, the fear , most importantly they can't fatten their pocket in the process either. And Bhutto stood to expose all that and more. So she was murdered. America's puppy Musharraf looks too guilty to me. BTW, Did you see his interview on 60 minutes? You shouldn't be too quick to defend this adminstration, they got too much blood in their hands!!

"One needs to be slow to form convictions..." isn't that the headline from your blog anonymous? :) (Comment this)

Written by: Mimi at 2008/01/14 - 09:14:53
6 - Conspiracy! I doubt it! Readers, don't forget the history of Bhutto during her premiership. It was clouded with fraud and consipiracy by her and her likes. There are few times where politician came as "Born agains" and if they did they go back to their former practice of cheat, steal and abuse. Obote of Uganda came back and continued torturing people, George Wallace came back and appologize and Bhotto.... who knows?

Ketsela (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2008/01/14 - 13:09:42
Write a comment