The Human Vultures
How Low They Can Go

The picture above was published in The New York Times in 1993. It was taken by a South African photographer named Kevin Carter, who was covering the humanitarian crisis in Sudan in the 90's. As you can see in this symbolic image, a vulture, aware that a starving Sudanese girl is close to taking her last breath, is stalking her in order to feed its hunger. In 1994, Kevin Carter won a Pulitzer Prize for this picture. A few months later he committed suicide because of severe depression.
In the year 2007, it looks like Africa is facing different types of vultures - the human variety. In a way, one can argue that the human vultures are more inhumane than the real ones. At least the real vultures like the one in the illustration wait for the preys to die before they feed on them. They follow the natural order of things in that if they don't, they will end up being preys themselves. These human vultures feed on people who are alive but are too frail and too powerless to help or protect themselves.
This is a story about human beings who barely fit that adjective, because they represent the worst in humans. They are the bottom feeders, both symbolically and literally in every sense of the word, who have no conscience whatsoever.
The story that was exposed recently by Gregg Palast, a remarkable American reporter for BBC's NewsNight. Palast is a scarcely known investigative journalist in the US, but has reported on many important stories in the US, mostly about the scandals of the Bush Administration. These are stories which were not even skimmed over by the main stream US media, but very important in their relevance. They include the controversial events that took place pre-Hurricane Katrina and how the Bush Administration stole, yes you read it right, stole the 2004 presidential election using a tactic called "caging", a term, incidentally, most people in the US will be very familiar with in the coming months. This "vulture funds" story, yet another winner for Gregg Palast, is a perfect example of the mainstream media falling asleep on the job in that even after it has been reported on in the UK, none of the major news agencies has made a mention of it in the US. There is your 'liberal media' hard at work for you. Palast, as he did many times in the past, connects the usual suspects - the Bush Administration and the Republican Party with some of the most despicable of characters with no conscience.It is no secret that the Bush Administration has been a colossal failure in every area imaginable both domestically and internationally. However, one area it has been receiving much praise on, even from its ardent critics, is its handling of the issue in debt reduction policy for poor African countries so that they can fight poverty and the AIDS crisis. Even dedicated AIDS activists like Paul David Hewson AKA Bono have praised Bush's effort to fight AIDS by helping reduce debts and in some cases by canceling them. As recently as last week, reporters have heaped huge praise on Bush for this very issue as well as allocating significant amount of money to fight poverty and AIDS in poor African countries.
In the past, I have, perhaps too cynically or maybe out of just sheer irrational bias, been skeptical of Bush's action regarding this issue, because it appeared to be somewhat inconsistent with the way he handled crises involving other poor people who needed immediate attention by his Administration. Hurricane Katrina comes to mind. Everyone knows that while New Orleans was drowning, Bush was playing guitar in Arizona. Let's face it; the man is a prototypical psychopath with the competency level less than a county supervisor let alone a world leader.
So what was behind Mr Bush's unusual generosity to the poor in Africa? Well, it looks like my suspicion was not so unfounded after all. As we did in the past, let's follow the money. Yes, once again Bush's buddies, just like they do in every other industry, are the beneficiaries of this latest heist. It appears that the money which is allocated to help reduce the debts of these nations, in some cases, never even reaches the people who need it. Through the usual Republican Party's nefarious scheme of money exchanging from one crook to another, and a little help from some corrupt leaders, vultures like Paul Singer and Michael Sheehan, owners of what are euphemistically called "debt advisory" companies, divert money away from the needy into their own pockets.
Here's how it works. A poor nation borrows money from a country willing to lend it. Unable to pay back the loan, the borrowing country defaults on the loan. The lending country, rather than losing the whole amount, will negotiate to collect a smaller amount of the original debt. However, before the deal is finalized, these 'debt advisory' companies owned by the likes of Mr Singer and Mr Sheehan jump in and purchase the loan from the lending country. The corrupt president of the poor country, instead of protesting the deal, is pacified and silenced through bribes by the vultures. The debt advisory companies then take this poor country to court and sue for the original amount plus interest. Where does the money come from to pay these companies? Of course, from funds allocated to fight AIDS and poverty in these poor countries by those jolly old fellas', "salt of the earth" guys, G W Bush and his lapdog accomplice Tony Blair using US and UK tax payers' money - yet another wonderful use of tax payer money to portray the two countries as nations filled with heartless and unsympathetic people. And what is the connection between Mr Bush, the Republican Party and these vultures, I mean besides their well documented basic lack of humanity? Yep, you guessed it, campaign contribution! In both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, Singer made a $300, 000 and $1.2 million in donations respectively to the Bush camp. As you will see in the video, Bush and Blair are being silent accomplices by allowing this travesty to take place.
It may not seem too fashionable to question or be suspicious of issues like this, since, at first glance, it may seem like a case of biting the hand that feeds you. But it is extremely important to look behind the headlines when claims of extra ordinary generosities are made by people who have shown to be less than generous in the past. This is too important an issue to be left to the main stream US media.
So, which countries are being hounded currently by these vultures? Here is a list from the International Development Association (a World Bank Group) as of 2006. And yes, it includes Ethiopia.
Please watch the short video below by Gregg Palast. It is sure to leave you speechless.
Incidentally, I would like to encourage everyone to thank Congressmen John Conyers (D-MI) and Donald Payne (D-NJ), yes the same Donald Payne who is fighting an uphill battle in Congress for Ethiopians, in their effort to put an end to this disgusting practice.
And please send Mr Sheehan an e-mail and let him know how you feel about this.
Thank you!





