Massacre at Virginia Tech
WHY?
By Ketsela
The world has come to close for comfort. War is not a heroic deed anymore except when it involves decision taken unilaterally by one country over the other. But when colleges and universities experience brutal murder, then and there the underlying reason for the cause is hard to find. I remember a professor who used to say “after the fact even fools have give reason as to why it happened. I feel sad and dismayed to the recent event at V-tech. Certainly I am not in any position to blame neither the university administration nor the young man who caused this anguish to the deceased. University campuses must be free of all the evils of the world and should remain academically free of exercising freedom of speech and the freedom to be what one wanted to be. Assertiveness is what is taught as a prerequisite to being a university student. In the current situation it should be a time to mourn, not to point fingers at the sole young man Mr. Cho Seung-hui. The court system alone gives room to the accused of his/her status of being temporarily insane. That is the greatness of the American law. Then again the same court upholds the right to bear arms to the citizens. The later was written over 200 years ago during the British rule. It is old and need to be amended by all means. The right to bear arms; give me a break! A tank is also considered to be an arm. Should I then buy one and put it in front of my apartment. No! Of all the places in the world there should be two places where there should not be a law but must be accepted by all involved that guns, rifles or any tools that endanger another human must not be carried are school and house of prayers.
A reader to Star Tribune wrote:
Here we go again! Back on the couch, Nation, for our next mass analysis session. Just as we were getting up from the Don Imus situation comes the Virginia Tech shootings! As long as most of the analysis will be “smoke blowing,” here is some more; America’s history is replete with shooting people __ from wild west to wars _ as a problem solving method. For the latest example, see Iraq ___where we are shooting people in order to free them. Check out your own children’s games, watch an evening of main stream TV or go to a popular movie. Which dots can you connect?
Technology and culture are two things that are dynamics. They come and go. I am not going to compare my college days to the today ones. I remember students used to call bomb threat merely because they might have one too many beers. But the current Ipod student populations in many ways are far better but seemed to be loneliest to their surroundings. Maybe I embarked into the wrong conclusion but it is my feeling. The young man had on many occasions directly or indirectly showed who was but human nature can not make determination if anything was wrong with him. America has so many cultures and traditions and one can never whole-heartedly say Mr. X is nuts. Lawyers and advocates will raise their voices against such statement. The end result of this incident will most likely take part of the academic freedom of the student population. Maybe, I rather prefer the old Haile Selassie University Academic policy “Students have academic right to discuss and practice except religion and politics.”





Ketsee- Yet another great article!
"Why?" is the million dollar question.
I think mass murderers like Cho feel dismissed and disenfranchised. They internalize their anger, rejection, pain, and isolation and one day revenge against a world that makes them feel so invisible.
I think the rampages are their way of taking action and getting attention or being relevant. Killing is their way of striking out. Using guns and being violent toward others moves them from powerlessness to power. They probably feel like that is the only way that they would be noticed and want to leave their mark in the world.
Years of being picked on or bullied by peers takes toll and results in build-up of rage and depression, that overwhelm the brain making a person have a distorted view of the world. Psychopaths like that have a restricted view of other people's feelings and worth...all they feel is the must need to bring their situation to some dramatic conclusion.
None of the victims means anything to the psychopath. He recognizes other people only as enemies, who are responsible for inflicting the utter loneliness and sadness he feels. A psychopath does not feel any guilt for destroying their lives, or grasp what the victims feel. He doesn't quite comprehend emotions like love or caring because he has never experienced them directly and he is too angry.
People who make the decision to kill others have distorted thinking. Their thought patterns of life as being fair starts to erode and is replaced by a view that the world is out to get them. They start to be that they should strike out at others. They are overwhelmed with anger and hate and lack good coping skills to deal with the intensity of their emotions, thus resorting to killing.
This is what I think.
(Comment this)
As for the gun issue in this country, first I might disagree with you a bit with your take of the constitution. The Constitution does not say anything about the right for an individual to bare arms. It is all the twisting and bending of the NRA and the right wing nut jobs who say that it is their Cons right to own a gun. I like your pint about the tank though. I will take it even a step further and say how about technical nukes? They are weapons too. It is crazy!!! This is a vengeful and violent society. The country was built on violence. I am reminded of Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin the former H Rap Brown quote "Violence is as American as apple pie". Nice article. (Comment this)
Blame in America goes to any and every organizations. We are in this world tied by these forces and there is no escape from it.
Lawyers play the big role in the making and breaking of individuals. They never stop to be "An ambulace chaser" from the very day they were told to stop.
Pschologists determine the fate of the individual in the name of scientific studies of making parents to decipline children.
Politicians are only interested in their own fate and will do anything and everything to keep their elected position prostituting principle if they have any.
Civil rights leaders are loud mouthed self promoted in the name of the people and amass $$$ to their wealth.
Church officials are nothing but phonies and far from the spiritual education of their preaching.
Social services workers are welfare receipients in as far as I am concerned. All they want is to be funded by government and foundations.
Of course the media is not there to aware people on the conditions of the country and the world but only interested on human sufferings. I assure you if there was a man on the ledge to jump, instead of trying to help him of his misries they wanted their kodak moment and encourage him to jump.
Then you look at such victims like cho who was confused in this individualistic society and resort to massacaring 32 people, they still believe one's right to bear arms. No one seemed to be concerned to his state of mind except the killing part nor were they interested if there are others coming after him. Like you said the best thing is not to be there at the right time and at the right place. (Comment this)
Juru, I think what Ketsela was referring to was to the situation where Mr Cho was exhibitting some strange and disturbing behavior in his scholl work to the point that the teacher was forced to notify the school officials about it. I think Mr K is saying that students should be allowed to practice academic freedom. If the other institutions had done their jobs and this situation could have been prevented.
Am I correct Ketse?
(Comment this)
Chereka,
When the writer said "the end result of this incident..." he gave me impression that somewhat lack of acadamic freedom is a contributing factor in the killer act. To be honest with you, because of cultural sensitivity issues, the school could've not taken any measures towards him (given the killer koria-American ethnic background).They could have get sued or labeled as insensitive to diversity groups. To me,in school settings acadamic freedom and cultural sensitivties are a paradox.
(Comment this)